Windows Commands Abused by Attackers

Hello again, this is Shusei Tomonaga from the Analysis Center.

In Windows OS, various commands (hereafter “Windows commands”) are installed by default. However, what is actually used by general users is just a small part of it. On the other hand, JPCERT/CC has observed that attackers intruding into a network also use Windows commands in order to collect information and/or to spread malware infection within the network. What is worth noting here is the gap between those Window commands used by general users and by attackers. If there is a huge difference, it would be possible to detect or limit the attackers’ behaviour by monitoring/controlling the Windows command execution.

This entry will demonstrate how to mitigate the attack impact by revealing Windows commands that attackers use on the intruded Windows OS, and by restricting the execution of those commands that are unnecessary for general users.

Malware for remote control (Remote Access Tool/Trojan – RAT) has a function to execute shell commands from a remote environment. With this, attackers can execute Windows commands from a remote environment.

Attackers who successfully installed such malware in a network will attempt to take control of the system within the network in the following sequence in order to collect confidential information, etc.

  1. Initial investigation: Collect information of the infected machine
  2. Reconnaissance: Look for information saved in the machine and remote machines within the network
  3. Spread of infection: Infect the machine with other malware or try to access other machines

Windows commands are used in all of the phases above. Respective Windows commands used in each phase are introduced here below.

Initial Investigation

Table 1 lists the commands that are often used by attackers in an attempt to collect information of the infected machine. “Times executed” is derived from the sum of Windows commands used by 3 different attack groups in their respective C&C servers (Please refer to Appendix A, B and C for details).

Table 1: Initial Investigation (Top 10 commands)
Ranking Command Times executed
1 tasklist 155
2 ver 95
3 ipconfig 76
4 systeminfo 40
5 net time 31
6 netstat 27
7 whoami 22
8 net start 16
9 qprocess 15
10 query 14

Attackers use commands such as “tasklist”, “ver”, “ipconfig” and “systeminfo”, etc., and collect information of the network, process and OS in order to investigate what kind of machine they succeeded in infecting. This is presumably how they make sure that the machine is not a sandbox for malware analysis purposes and so on.

Reconnaissance

Commands shown in Table 2 are often used to search for confidential information and remote machines within the network.

Table 2: Reconnaissance (Top 10 commands)
Ranking Command Times executed
1 dir 976
2 net view 236
3 ping 200
4 net use 194
5 type 120
6 net user 95
7 net localgroup 39
8 net group 20
9 net config 16
10 net share 11

Attackers use “dir” and “type” to search for files. Sometimes they collect a list of all the document files in the infected machine by setting appropriate options and arguments for “dir” command.

For searching networks, “net” is used. In particular, the following commands are often seen:

  • net view: Obtain a list of connectable domain resources
  • net user: Manage local/domain accounts
  • net localgroup: Obtain a list of users belonging to local groups
  • net group: Obtain a list of users belonging to certain domain groups
  • net use: Access to resources

Furthermore, the following commands may be used in an environment where Active Directory is used (Please refer to Table 5 in Appendix A). These commands are installed in Windows Server and do not originally exist in client OS such as Windows 7 and 8.1 – but attackers download and install these commands from outside and execute them.

  • dsquery: Search for accounts in Active Directory
  • csvde: Obtain account information in Active Directory

Spread of Infection

To intrude remote machines and spread malware infection within the network, the following commands are often executed:

Table 3: Spread of Infection
Ranking Command Times executed
1 at 103
2 reg 31
3 wmic 24
4 wusa 7
5 netsh advfirewall 4
6 sc 4
7 rundll32 2

*”wmic” is also used for reconnaissance.

“at” and “wmic” are often used to execute malware on remote machines.

With “at” command, attackers can execute commands on remote machines, by registering tasks to execute files against connectable machines as follows.

at \\[remote host name or IP address] 12:00 cmd /c "C:\windows\temp\mal.exe"

Also, by setting the following options and arguments with “wmic” command, attackers can execute commands on remote machines.

wmic /node:[IP address] /user:”[user name]” /password:”[password]” process call create “cmd /c c:\Windows\System32\net.exe user”

Restricting Execution of Unnecessary Windows Commands

It is fair to say that these Windows commands used by attackers include those that are unused by general users, if carefully selected. With AppLocker and software restriction policy, which restrict such commands from being executed, it would be possible to limit the attackers’ behaviour. For example, if you wish to restrict “net” commands, you can set rules as in Figure 1. (For details of AppLocker configuration, please see Microsoft’s Website [1]).

Figure 1: AppLocker Rules
Figure1

Also, by enabling AppLocker, events where selected Windows commands were executed or attempted but denied will be recorded in the event logs, which can be utilized for investigation on Windows commands that attackers executed after infecting the machine with malware.

Figure 2: Logs of the Processes Restricted by AppLocker
Figure2

AppLocker can also just monitor Windows commands [2]. With this, AppLocker cannot prevent unintended Windows commands from being executed, but the execution history will be recorded in the event log. If the users themselves use Windows commands that may be used for attacks, it is a good idea to set AppLocker just for monitoring purpose. (Windows command execution can also be monitored by activating “Audit Process Creation” in the local security policy.)

Conclusion

In targeted attacks, attackers not only use functions implemented in the malware, but also often use Windows commands to pursue their purposes. If such activities can be hindered, spread of incidents can be prevented in a fairly early stage. However, it may be difficult to limit the usage of Windows commands right away – so our recommendation is to start by collecting logs of executed processes by using AppLocker, etc.

Thank you for reading and best wishes for the New Year!

- Shusei Tomonaga


Reference:

[1] Microsoft - Windows AppLocker
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd759117.aspx

[2] Microsoft – Using Auditing to Track Which Applications Are Used

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd723693%28v=ws.10%29.aspx

Appendix A: List of Executed Commands by respective Attack Groups (Attack Group A)
Table 4: Initial Investigation (Attack Group A)
Ranking Command Times executed Option
1 tasklist 119 /s /v
2 ver 92  
3 ipconfig 58 /all
4 net time 30  
5 systeminfo 24  
6 netstat 22 -ano
7 qprocess 15  
8 query 14 user
9 whoami 14 /all
10 net start 10  
11 nslookup 4  
12 fsutil 3 fsinfo drives
13 time 2 /t
14 set 1  

Table 5: Reconnaissance (Attack Group A)
Ranking Command Times executed Option
1 dir 903  
2 net view 226  
3 ping 196  
4 net use 193  
5 type 118  
6 net user 74  
7 net localgroup 35  
8 net group 19  
9 net config 16  
10 net share 11  
11 dsquery 6  
12 csvde 5 /f /q
13 nbtstat 5 -a
14 net session 3  
15 nltest 3 /dclist
16 wevtutil 2  

Table 6: Spread of Infection (Attack Group A)
Ranking Command Times executed Option
1 at 98  
2 reg 29 add export query
3 wmic 24  
4 netsh advfirewall 4  
5 sc 4 qc query
6 wusa 2  
Appendix B: List of Executed Commands by respective Attack Groups (Attack Group B)
Table 7: Initial Investigation (Attack Group B)
Ranking Command Times executed Option
1 tasklist 29 /m /svc
2 whoami 6  
3 ipconfig 5 /all
4 net start 4  
5 netstat 3 -ano
6 nslookup 3  
7 ver 2  
8 time 1 /t

Table 8: Reconnaissance (Attack Group B)
Ranking Command Times executed Option
1 dir 62  
2 net user 21 /domain /add
3 net view 9 /domain
4 ping 4  
5 net localgroup 4 /add
6 tree 3 /F
7 type 2  
8 net group 1 /domain

Table 9: Spread of Infection (Attack Group B)
Ranking Command Times executed Option
1 at 5  
2 wusa 5  
3 reg 2  
4 rundll32 2  
Appendix C: List of Executed Commands by respective Attack Groups (Attack Group C)
Table 10: Initial Investigation (Attack Group C)
Ranking Command Times executed Option
1 systeminfo 16  
2 ipconfig 13 /all /?
3 tasklist 7  
4 netstat 5 -ano
5 whoami 2  
6 net start 2  
7 arp 1 -a
8 chcp 1  
9 net time 1  
10 ver 1  

Table 11: Reconnaissance (Attack Group C)
Ranking Command Times executed Option
1 dir 11  
2 net user 1 /all /?
3 net view 1  
4 qwinsta 1 -ano

*Commands for “Spread of Infection” by Attack Group C are omitted since they did not spread the infection.

Back
Top
Next